Jo, famous mostly for her no-nonsense analysis and unfettered opinions, had a scathing condemnation laid on President Trump in his alleged request for a military parade to celebrate his birthday. Just so infuriated by Trump’s giant display of power, Jo basically flew off the handle in a long profanity-laden tirade against Trump for disrespecting the military, veterans, and Gold Star families throughout his entire life.
Advertisement
In Jo’s view, the whole symbolism of disrespect for the military which Trump allegedly participated in—from draft dodging accusations to disparaging remarks about POWs and dead soldiers—is precisely why that birthday parade is the ultimate personal narcissistic expression: “our troops are nothing more than a prop to suit his fragile fucking ego.” The post also referred to the alleged “suckers and losers” remark that Trump might have made about war dead, a remark thoroughly contested to this day.
Jo’s rant split the reactions predictably into two camps. Supporters applauded Jo for daring to say aloud what they see as uncomfortable truths about the relationship between Trump and the military, with one admirer joining in the chorus and even suggested Jo monetize her commentary skills, whereas some brought up Biden’s draft record in an attempt to label the critique as hypocritical.
The loyalists of Trump also answered quickly and sharply. Several said that the “suckers and losers” remark was “debunked numerous times,” even as fact-checkers have found officials who have taken a stand in support of that account. Several other critics questioned Jo about her own military service or mentioned other presidents who had not served overseas. “What do you care? Biden sends billions to Ukraine,” another retorted, dragging the discussion into current military spending priorities.
The conversation took several bizarre turns, including a baseless personal attack launched by a user baiting another, declaring that Jo needed to “get over the meth.” One can hardly picture a more depressing epitome of what our political discourse has degraded into. However, at least one productive debate arose as to whether the parade was really for honoring the Army celebrating its 250th birthday for real or was more about honoring Trump personally.
Thus, what unfolds out of this digital skirmish is less a matter of objective debate and more about the unsolvable set of conflicting worldviews that define American politics today. Jo’s supporters treat her rant as righteous anger at legitimate offenses, while Trump defenders see it as yet another instance of hysterical opposition to anything related to the former president. The military—traditionally an institution outside of partisan politics—becomes just another battlefield in this endless cultural war.
Curiously absent was any serious take about the merits or costs of military parades. Jo’s $92 million price tag was never challenged in the replies, and no one ever offered any source to back the claim. Also missing was, for once, a viewpoint from active-duty military personnel about how they would look on such an occasion. The debate thus reverted back into the well-worn grooves of personal slights and tribal loyalties, rather than meaningful policy.
Advertisement
Approaching the 2024 election cycle, one might expect that conversations like this portend a better future. They won’t, however; the sparkler-fest ignited by Trump’s demand for a birthday parade will have long been forgotten, while the more profound fissures it points to will remain unapologetically unhealed by anyone. In their split realities, Americans nowadays contest even most basic facts—whether it is military honors or just about anything else.
No responses yet